Instructional Materials Alignment and Pupil Engagement Among Grade 6 Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v5i6.129Keywords:
Instructional materials, alignment, pupil engagement, Grade 6 learners, behavioral engagementAbstract
This quantitative study examined the alignment of instructional materials and its relationship with pupil engagement among Grade 6 learners at Barbo Elementary School. It aimed to determine the level of instructional material alignment, the level of pupil engagement, and the significance of the relationship between these variables. A descriptive-correlational research design was employed, involving 31 Grade 6 students selected through total enumeration sampling. Data were collected using a researcher-made validated questionnaire and analyzed using mean and Pearson’s r correlation. The findings revealed a high level of instructional material alignment across all indicators, indicating strong support for the teaching and learning process. Pupil engagement was also found to be high in the behavioral, emotional, and cognitive domains. Furthermore, the results showed a low but statistically significant positive correlation between instructional material alignment and pupil engagement. These findings suggest that well-aligned instructional materials contribute to enhanced pupil engagement in the classroom.
References
Abuel, L. C. (2023). Digital instructional materials in students’ engagement and performance. International Journal of Research Publications.https://ijrp.org/filePermission/fileDownlaod
Amos, S., Eghan, M. P. K., & Oppong, E. (2022). The impact of instructional materials in teaching and learning of biology in the colleges of education in the Central Region of Ghana. Open Journal of Educational Research, 2(5), 213–221. https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/ojer/article/view/400
Aquino, E. T. M., & Gurat, M. G. (2023). Satisfaction of students in the methods used in mathematics in the modern world in a new normal. American Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 144–150. http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/11/3/7/
Cempron, D. N. L. (2021). An inquiry on the underlying instructional materials in social studies.https://www.researchgate.net/
Creswell, J.W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.) SAGE Publications. https://spada.uns.ac.id/
Department of Education Regional Office VIII. (2022). 2023–2028 Regional Education Development Plan. https://region8.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/RM-s2022-1329.pdf
Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide – Grade 6. https://www.deped.gov.
DePaul University Teaching Commons. (2025). Alignment in course design. DePaul University. https://resources.depaul.edu/teaching-commons/teaching-guides/course-design/Pages
Dhakal, K. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions toward using geography textbooks: A study in secondary schools in Nepal. The Third Pole: Journal of Geography Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.3126/ttp.v21i01.41614
Dumpang, C. N., Caliwan, M. A., & Caliwas, L. J. B. (2021). Needs assessment of Grade 8 instructional materials in teaching Filipino: A phenomenology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349900422_
EdReports. (2023). Annual report 2023. https://cdn.edreports.org/media
EdReports. (2024). Reflections on 2024 and looking to the future of EdReports. EdReports.org. https://edreports.org/resources/article/reflections-2024-future-of-edreports
Education Elements. (n.d.). A comprehensive guide to high-quality instructional materials (HQIM). Education Elements. https://www.edelements.com/comprehensive-hqim-curriculum-guide
Foster, S. (2023). Facilitating and assessing student engagement in the classroom. Center for Teaching & Learning, University of Colorado Boulder. https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/2023/01/23/facilitating-and-assessing-student-engagement-classroom
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed). McGraw-Hill Education. https://saochhenpheng.wordpress.com/wp-content/up;oads/2017/03/kack_fraenkel_norman_wallen_hyun-how_to_design_and_evaluate_research _in_education_8th_edition_-mcgraw-hill_humanities_social_sciences_languages2011.pdf
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement:
Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational
Research, 74 (1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Garcia, E., & Weiss, E. (2020). COVID-19 and student performance, equity, and U.S. education policy: Lessons from pre-pandemic research to inform relief, recovery, and rebuilding. Economic Policy Institute.https://www.epi.org/publication/the-consequences-of-the-covid-19-pandemic-for-education-performance-and-equity-in-the-united-states
Geleta, S., & Seyoum, Y. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of using instructional materials: Evidence from Haramaya Town. East African Journal of Education Studies, 7(2), 99–111. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380122303_
Gubaton, M. C. T. (2024). Level of students’ motivation and engagement: Basis for an enhanced intervention to promote students’ learning. Universal Institute of Research and Technology. https://uijrt.com/paper/level-students-motivation-engagement
Jibililu, O. S. (2024). Evaluating the impact of instructional materials on social studies learning outcomes in senior high schools of the Bono East Region of Ghana. Social Education Research, 5(2), 380–397. https://ojs.wiserpub.com/index.php/SER/article/view/4881
Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20-23. https://malat-webspace.royal.ca
Laerd Statistics. (2018). Pearson’s product-moment correlation using SPSS Statistics. Lund Research Ltd. https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/pearsons-product-moment-correlation-using-spss-statistics.php
Lattanze, R. (2025). Unlocking student engagement: Strategies for meaningful learning outcomes. Xello. https://xello.world/en/blog/student-engagement/what-is-student-engagement/
Lee, H., & Choi, J. (2020). Curriculum alignment after reforms: A systematic review with considerations for Queensland pre- and in-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(11). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1289131.pdf
Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059
Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Denessen, E., Aelterman, N., & Haerens, L. (2020). Fostering student engagement with motivating teaching: An observation study of teacher and student behaviours. Research Papers in Education, 36(6), 754–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1767184
Medical College of Wisconsin. (2022). Cognitive load theory: A guide to applying cognitive load theory to your teaching. Office of Educational Improvement. https://www.mcw.edu/-/media/MCW/Education/Academic-Affairs/OEI/Faculty-Quick-Guides/Cognitive-Load-Theory.pdf
Miremba, B. K. (2024). Role of instructional materials in students’ academic performance. Research Invention Journal of Current Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 15–27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382004589
Nguyen, L. T., Pham, H. H., & Le, M. T. (2021). Revisiting pupil engagement in the digital classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 88–100. https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/journals/24_2/7.pdf
Penuel, W. R., Henson, K., Buck Bracey, Z., Vick, N., & Rivet, A. (2024). Designing standards-aligned instructional materials that connect to students’ interests and community priorities. The Social Studies, 115(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368555.2024.2390547
Polikoff, M. S. (2012). Instructional alignment under No Child Left Behind. American Journal of Education, 118(3), 341–368. https://doi.org/10.1086/664773
Portana, et al. (2020). Effectiveness and acceptability of instructional materials in the enhancement of students’ academic engagement. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348334247_
Rachmad, Y. E. (2022). Educational engagement theory. Lüneburger Heide Buch Internationaler Verlag, Spezialausgabe 2022. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KGTCX
Rivet Education. (2024). Why high-quality instructional materials are essential for teacher and student success: How standards-aligned, culturally responsive, and inclusive materials drive learning in every classroom. https://riveteducation.org/why-high-quality-instructional-materials-are-essential-for-teacher-and-student-success-how-standards-aligned-culturally-responsive-and-inclusive-materials-drive-learning-in-every-classroom/
Romarate, M. A, Aquino, A. B., Punongbayan, J.E., Quezon, G. R., Balilla, L. A., & Ramos, N. P., (2023). Development of outcomes-based instructional materials in professional teacher education courses for a flexible set up. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research ,10 (1), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i1.4378
Sabayton, K.M.G., Alvarado, R.M.E., Bacus, J.A.,& Baluyos, G.R. (2023).Instructional materials motivation and synchronous classroom learning in relation to the students’ academic performance in mathematics. Eduline:Journal of Education and Learning Innovation. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline1988
Saher, S., & Kashif, N. (2020). Analysis of alignment between the national curriculum of education and textbooks at the higher secondary level in Punjab-Pakistan. Review of Economics and Development Studies, 6 (3), 687–702. https://doi.org/10.47067/reads.v6i3.256
Saunders, L., & Wong, M. A. (2020). Designing instructional materials. ABC-CLIO. https://iopn.library.illinois.edu/pressbooks/instructioninlibraries/chapter/designing-instructional-
Second Congressional Commission on Education (EDCOM II). (2024). Miseducation: The failed system of Philippine education (Year One Report). https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2024/02/EDCOM-II-Year-One-Report-PDF-022924.pdf
Smithwhite, S. (2024). Why do high-quality instructional materials matter? Imagine Learning. https://www.edsurge.com/news/2024-07-10-why-do-high-quality-instructional-materials-matter
Statistics How To. (2025). Total population sampling. https://www.statisticshowto.com/total-population-sampling/
Steiner, D. (2024). The unrealized promise of high-quality instructional materials. State Education Standard, 24(1). https://www.nasbe.org/the-unrealized-promise-of-high-quality-instructional-materials/
Subramainan, L., & Mahmoud, M. A. (2020). A systematic review on students’ engagement in classroom: Indicators, challenges and computational techniques. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110113
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Tomei, L. (2009). Instructional materials: Definition and examples. In Lexicon of education terms. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8109-3
UNESCO & Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization. (2023). Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? Global Education Monitoring Report. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/2023-southeast-asia
University of Massachusetts Amherst. (2025). Develop engaging instructional materials. IDEAS: Instructional Design, Engagement, and Support. https://www.umass.edu/ideas/develop-engaging-instructional-materials
Urias, L. R. (2022). Addressing the problem of student engagement in the classroom (Master’s project). Grand Valley State University. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/gradprojects/225
Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Meutstege, K., & de Vries, J. (2023). Adapting teaching to students’ needs: What does it require from teachers? Educational Review. https://www.researchgate.net/
Wadmare, P., Nanda, M., Sabates, R., Sunder, N., & Wadhwa, W. (2022). Understanding the accuracy of teachers’ perceptions about low-achieving learners in primary schools in rural India: An empirical analysis of alignments and misalignments. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100198
Wang, E. L., Prado Tuma, A., Doan, S., Henry, D., Lawrence, R. A., Woo, A., & Kaufman, J. H. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of what makes instructional materials engaging, appropriately challenging, and usable: A survey and interview study. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA134-2.html
Wang, Q., Liu, J., & Sun, L. (2022). Student perception and engagement: Exploring classroom material relevance. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101940
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sanny Rose Daganta, Angelica C. Catenza, Anita Jane A. Amano, Florabel C. Tejana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





























