2828-1519 East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) 2828-1519 EAJMR 10.55927/eajmr.v5i6.129 Instructional Materials Alignment and Pupil Engagement Among Grade 6 Learners DagantaSanny Rose CatenzaAngelica C. AmanoAnita Jane A. TejanaFlorabel C. 13 04 2026 14 05 2026 17 06 2026 5 6 2029 2044 This quantitative study examined the alignment of instructional materials and its relationship with pupil engagement among Grade 6 learners at Barbo Elementary School. It aimed to determine the level of instructional material alignment, the level of pupil engagement, and the significance of the relationship between these variables. A descriptive-correlational research design was employed, involving 31 Grade 6 students selected through total enumeration sampling. Data were collected using a researcher- made validated questionnaire and analyzed using mean and Pearson’s r correlation. The findings revealed a high level of instructional material alignment across all indicators, indicating strong support for the teaching and learning process. Pupil engagement was also found to be high in the behavioral, emotional, and cognitive domains. Furthermore, the results showed a low but statistically significant positive correlation between instructional material alignment and pupil engagement. These findings suggest that well-aligned instructional materials contribute to enhanced pupil engagement in the classroom. Instructional materials alignment pupil engagement Grade 6 learners behavioral engagement INTRODUCTION

Instructional materials play a vital role in supporting effective teaching and learning. When aligned with curriculum standards and learning objectives, these materials help learners understand lessons more clearly, remain focused, and actively participate in classroom activities. Research has shown that curriculum-aligned instructional materials contribute to improved learning outcomes, particularly when supported by effective teaching practices (EdReports, 2024).

Across Asia, educational reforms have emphasized strengthening the alignment among curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Countries such as Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand have implemented curriculum review and content auditing initiatives to improve instructional quality. Despite these efforts, challenges such as limited resources, inadequate teacher training, and contextual adaptation continue to affect the effectiveness of instructional materials and student engagement (UNESCO & SEAMEO, 2023). In the Philippines, the Department of Education promotes the alignment of instructional materials with the K–12 and MATATAG curricula. However, many public schools continue to rely on teacher-made materials and self-learning modules due to delays in textbook distribution (EDCOM II, 2024). While these resources demonstrate teacher innovation, concerns remain regarding their consistency with intended learning competencies. Well-aligned instructional materials are believed to enhance learner engagement by making lessons more meaningful, understandable, and relevant (Aquino & Gurat, 2023).

Given the importance of engagement in learners’ academic success, this study examines the relationship between instructional materials alignment and pupil engagement among Grade 6 learners at Barbo Elementary School. The findings are expected to provide insights for improving instructional resource development, teacher practices, and curriculum implementation.

THEORETICAL REVIEW

Previous literature consistently emphasizes that instructional materials play a crucial role in promoting meaningful learning and learner engagement. Studies indicate that instructional materials are most effective when they are aligned with curriculum standards, learning objectives, and learners’ developmental needs (Smithwhite, 2024; Rivet Education, 2024). Well-aligned materials help learners understand concepts more easily, reduce cognitive overload, and encourage active participation in classroom activities. Conversely, misaligned materials may lead to confusion, boredom, and decreased engagement (Steiner, 2024; Van Geel et al., 2025). Theoretical and empirical studies further highlight that learner engagement involves behavioral, emotional, and cognitive dimensions. According to Engagement Theory, students become more engaged when learning experiences are meaningful, relevant, and connected to their interests and real-life contexts (Rachmad, 2022). Research also shows that instructional materials that are culturally responsive, differentiated, and appropriate to learners’ abilities can enhance motivation and participation (Fernandez, 2020; Cempron, 2021).

Several studies found a positive relationship between the quality and alignment of instructional materials and student engagement. Digital, contextualized, and outcomes-based instructional materials were shown to improve learners’ motivation, participation, and academic performance (Romarate et al., 2023; Gubaton, 2024; Pagutayao & Paglinawan, 2024). However, challenges such as inadequate teacher training, resource limitations, and mismatches between instructional content and learner needs may reduce the effectiveness of instructional materials (Miremba, 2025; Dhakal, 2020). Despite extensive research on instructional materials and teaching practices, limited studies have specifically examined how instructional material alignment influences pupil engagement in elementary school settings. This gap highlights the need for further investigation, particularly among Grade 6 learners, to better understand how alignment contributes to meaningful classroom engagement.

METHODOLOGY

This study employed a quantitative descriptive-correlational research design to examine the relationship between instructional material alignment and pupil engagement among Grade 6 learners at Barbo Elementary School, Guiuan, Eastern Samar. The respondents consisted of 31 Grade 6 pupils selected through total enumeration sampling, wherein all enrolled and regularly attending pupils were included in the study. Data were collected using a researcher-made, expert- validated questionnaire composed of two sections: instructional material alignment (focusing on lesson objective alignment, clarity, relevance, and usefulness of materials) and pupil engagement (covering behavioral, emotional, and cognitive dimensions adapted from Fredricks et al., 2004). A 5-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree was utilized, with items simplified to suit the reading level of Grade 6 learners. Data collection was conducted face-to-face in the classroom after securing approval from school authorities, informed parental consent, and pupil assent. Ethical principles of confidentiality, anonymity, and voluntary participation were strictly observed. The collected data were encoded and analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Descriptive statistics, particularly mean scores, were used to determine the levels of instructional material alignment and pupil engagement, while the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (Pearson’s r) was employed to examine the relationship between the two variables at a 0.05 level of significance.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Alignment of Instructional Materials

The succeeding tables present the level of alignment of the instructional materials used in Grade 6 with the intended learning objectives, content and curriculum standards, and assessment and learning activities. Each aspect was rated by the respondents according to their level of agreement using the provided scale. The results are shown in the following tables.

Alignment of Instructional Materials Mean Description Interpretation
Alignment with Learning Objectives
1. The instructional materials used in class clearly show what I am expected to learn. 4.71 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
2. The activities and examples in our materials help me understand the lesson objectives. 4.35 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
3. The topics and lessons in the materials match what the teacher discusses. 4.06 Agree Aligned
4. The materials guide me toward achieving the learning goals of each lesson. 4.42 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
Grand Mean 4.39 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned

Based on Table 1, the alignment of instructional materials in terms learning of objectives was found to be highly aligned, except for the part with how the topics and lessons in the materials match what the teacher discusses, which gained a mean of 4.06, interpreted as aligned. In general, the instructional materials used among Grade 6 learners of Barbo Elementary School often match the intended learning objectives, as shown by the overall mean of 4.39, which falls under highly aligned in this indicator.

Alignment of Instructional Materials Mean Description Interpretation
Alignment with Content and Curriculum Standards
1. The lessons in our materials follow what is taught in our grade level. 4.23 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
2. The content in the materials supports the competencies listed in our subject. 4.35 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
3. The information and examples in the materials are relevant to what we study in class. 4.39 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
4. The materials are accurate and appropriate for my level of understanding. 4.35 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
Grand Mean 4.33 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned

As shown in Table 2, the alignment of instructional materials with content and curriculum standards consistently fared highly aligned in all items under this indicator. The item with the highest mean is the item that says “The materials are accurate and appropriate for their level of understanding”, while the lowest mean is on how “The content in the materials supports the competencies listed in their subject”. Although this item received the lowest score, it still falls within the “highly aligned” range, indicating that there are no major issues in this aspect. This suggests that the instructional materials consistently meet curriculum standards and effectively contribute to achieving the intended learning outcomes.

Alignment of Instructional Materials Mean Description Interpretation
Alignment with Assessment and Learning Activities
1. The exercises and activities in our materials help me prepare for quizzes and tests. 4.55 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
2. The performance tasks or projects match what is being taught in the lessons. 4.19 Agree Aligned
3. The questions and tasks in the materials help me think and apply what I learned. 4.29 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
4. The materials help me review and assess my own learning progress. 4.06 Agree Aligned
Grand Mean 4.27 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned

Table 3 presents the extent of alignment of instructional materials with assessment and learning activities. The results indicate that two items were rated as aligned. This suggests that, while the instructional materials generally support the assessments and learning activities provided to pupils, certain aspects may still require improvement to strengthen the connection between instruction, practice, and evaluation. Overall, the computed mean of 4.27 indicated that the instructional materials used among Grade 6 learners at Barbo Elementary School are highly aligned with assessment and learning activities. This level of alignment supports the assessment of the effectiveness of the teaching and learning process.

Aspects of Alignment Mean Description Interpretation
1. Alignment with Learning Objectives 4.39 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
2. Alignment with Content and Curriculum Standards 4.33 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
3. Alignment with Assessment and Learning Activities 4.27 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
Grand Mean 4.33 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned

As presented in Table 4, the overall extent of alignment of instructional materials used among Grade 6 learners at Barbo Elementary School was found to be highly aligned, with the overall mean of 4.33. This suggests that the instruction is consistently aligned with the intended learning objectives, curriculum standards, and assessment tasks. Such alignment indicates that teachers are effectively using instructional materials that support organized and coherent teaching while reinforcing expected learning outcomes. It also implies that classroom materials are well integrated into instruction, ensuring consistency among what is taught, practiced, and assessed.

Level of Pupil Engagement

This study examined the level of pupil engagement among Grade 6 learners at Barbo Elementary School in terms of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement, as presented in the succeeding tables.

Pupil Engagement Mean Description Interpretation
Behavioral Engagement
1. I listen attentively when lessons are being discussed using the instructional materials. 4.42 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
2. I participate actively in class activities related to the materials. 4.39 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
3. I finish all my tasks and exercises found in the instructional materials. 4.45 Strongly Agree Highly Aligned
4. I pay attention and avoid distractions when we use the materials in class. 4.00 Agree Aligned
Mean 4.31 Strongly Agree Highly Engaged

The results shown in Table 5 reveal that pupil engagement in terms of behavioral engagement is generally high, with an overall mean of 4.32. This indicates that learners consistently exhibit behaviors associated with active participation in classroom activities. The findings suggest that when instructional materials are properly aligned with learning objectives, they help maintain pupils ’ attention and interest, encouraging greater involvement in learning tasks. As a result, such alignment fosters a highly engaged classroom environment.

Pupil Engagement Mean Description Interpretation
Emotional Engagement
1. I enjoy using the instructional materials during class activities. 4.32 Strongly Agree Highly Engaged
2. I feel excited to learn new lessons using the materials. 4.29 Strongly Agree Highly Engaged
3. I feel confident answering or performing tasks based on the materials. 4.13 Agree Engaged
4. I feel that the instructional materials make learning more interesting. 4.29 Strongly Agree Highly Engaged
Grand Mean 4.26 Strongly Agree Highly Engaged

As reflected in Table 6, the level of pupil engagement in terms of emotional engagement obtained a total mean of 4.30, interpreted as highly engaged. This means that learners consistently show positive feelings toward their learning experiences, particularly when instructional materials are aligned with lessons. This emotional connection suggests that pupils find enjoyment and satisfaction in classroom activities, allowing them to stay motivated and responsive throughout the learning process.

Pupil Engagement Mean Description Interpretation
Cognitive Engagement
1. I try to find ways to understand difficult parts of the materials. 4.16 Agree Engaged
2. I think deeply about the lessons presented in the materials. 4.45 Strongly Agree Highly Engaged
3. I connect what I learn from the materials to real-life situations. 4.03 Agree Engaged
4. I review the materials even outside class to understand the lessons better. 4.45 Strongly Agree Highly Engaged
Grand Mean 4.27 Strongly Agree Highly Engaged

As shown in Table 7, the level of pupil engagement in terms of cognitive engagement has an overall mean of 4.20, described as “often” and interpreted as “engaged”. This indicates that learners consistently exhibit positive emotions toward their learning experiences, especially when instructional materials are well aligned with the lessons. This emotional connection suggests that pupils experience enjoyment and satisfaction during classroom activities, which helps them remain motivated and actively engaged throughout the learning process.

Pupil Engagement Mean Description Interpretation
1. Behavioral Engagement 4.31 Strongly Agree Highly Engaged
2. Emotional Engagement 4.26 Strongly Agree Highly Engaged
3. Cognitive Engagement 4.27 Agree Engaged
Grand Mean 4.28 Strongly Agree Highly Engaged

Table 8 presents a summary of the level of engagement among Grade 6 learners of Barbo Elementary School. The data imply that the overall level of pupil engagement among Grade 6 learners obtained a total mean of 4.28 which is interpreted as highly engaged. Among the three dimensions, behavioral engagement obtained the highest mean of 4.31, this shows that Grade 6 learners actively participate and stay attentive whenever materials effectively match with lesson objectives.

Relationship Between Instructional Material Alignment and Pupil Engagement

Variable 1 Variable 2 Correlation Coefficient Interpretation P-value Interpretation
Instructional Materials Alignment Pupil Engagement .369 Low Correlation .040 Significant

The table above shows the relationship between instructional materials alignment and pupil engagement. This study establishes that there is a significant relationship between the two variables presented, the instructional material alignment and the pupil engagement. As reflected in the table, the study generated an index of correlation at .369 and a p-value of .040, rejecting the null hypothesis stating that there is no significant relationship between the instructional material alignment and pupil engagement. Thus, the study implies that the more aligned the instructional materials are, the more engaged the pupils are, or the less aligned the instructional materials are, the more likely the pupils are to exhibit lower engagement in the classroom, although the relationship is not strong. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that Instructional Materials Alignment is positively associated with Pupil Engagement among Grade 6 learners. This conclusion supports the claim of Smithwhite (2024), who pointed out that appropriate alignment of instructional materials greatly impacts the learners’ performance positively. Similarly, Lattanze (2025) and Foster (2023) highlighted that aligning instructional resources with behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement factors enhances learner’s motivation and active participation.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The following conclusions were drawn based on the findings revealed in this study:

1. The instructional materials used in Grade 6 manifest an overall highly aligned level across all measured indicators. Specifically, the instructional materials were found to be highly aligned in terms of learning objectives, content, curriculum standards, and assessment and learning activities. This indicates that the resources effectively support the teaching-learning process.

2. The Grade 6 pupils demonstrated a highly engaged level across all indicators. Specifically, they exhibited highly levels of behavioural, emotional, and cognitive engagement, as reflected in their active participation, strong motivation, and effective processing and application of information in classroom activities.

3. The relationship between instructional was found to have a low positive but statistically significant correlation. This indicates that although the strength of the relationship is modest, higher alignment of instructional materials across all indicators is associated with increased levels of pupils’ engagement. Consequently, the null hypothesis stating that there is no significant relationship between instructional materials alignment and pupil engagement was rejected. This finding highlights the importance of well-aligned instructional resources in fostering learners’ engagement.

Recommendations

Based on the conclusions drawn, the researchers present the following recommendations

. Grade 6 teachers and curriculum planners should ensure that instructional materials are highly aligned across all dimensions including learning objectives, content and curriculum standards, and assessment and learning activities. Instructional materials should be regularly reviewed, updated, and adapted to further enhance alignment and support effective teaching and learning

2. Teachers should implement strategies that maintain and further improve pupil engagement behaviourally, emotionally, and cognitively. Teaching approaches should include interactive activities, formative assessments, and varied instructional methods to sustain high levels of pupil participation and motivation

3. Further investigations with a wider scope involving instructional materials alignment, and pupil engagement should be conducted to further validate the findings of this study. Such studies may include larger samples and different contexts to strengthen the generalizability of the results.

FURTHER STUDY

Future researchers are encouraged to conduct similar studies with larger and more diverse samples from different schools and educational settings to further validate and expand the findings on instructional material alignment and pupil engagement.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The researchers sincerely express their gratitude to the administrators, teachers, Grade 6 pupils of Barbo Elementary School, and their parents or guardians for their valuable support, cooperation, and participation in this study.

Abuel L. C. 2023 Digital instructional materials in students’ engagement and performance International Journal of Research Publications https://ijrp.org/filePermission/fileDownlaod/4/57b1cd6321266c8d1f93499c5cedb3de/2 AmosS. EghanM. P. K. OppongE. 2022 The impact of instructional materials in teaching and learning of biology in the colleges of education in the Central Region of Ghana Open Journal of Educational Research 2 5 213 221 https://www.scipublications.com/journal/index.php/ojer/article/view/400 AquinoE. T. M. GuratM. G. 2023 Satisfaction of students in the methods used in mathematics in the modern world in a new normal American Journal of Educational Research 11 3 144 150 http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/11/3/7/ CempronD. N. L. 2021 An inquiry on the underlying instructional materials in social studies ResearchGate https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352755933_An_Inquiry_on_the_Underlying_Instructional_Materials_in_Social_Studies CreswellJ. W. 2014 Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 4th ed. SAGE Publications https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf Department of Education Regional Office VIII 2022 2023–2028 Regional Education Development Plan https://region8.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/RM-s2022-1329.pdf Department of Education 2016 K to 12 Curriculum Guide – Grade 6 https://www.deped.gov.ph/k-to-12/about/k-to-12-basic-education-curriculum/ DePaul University Teaching Commons 2025 Alignment in Course Design DePaul University https://resources.depaul.edu/teaching-commons/teaching-guides/course-design/Pages/scaffolding-alignment.aspx DhakalK. 2021 Teachers’ perceptions toward using geography textbooks: A study in secondary schools in Nepal The Third Pole: Journal of Geography Education 21 1 10.3126/ttp.v21i01.41614 DumpangC. N. CaliwanM. A. CaliwasL. J. B. 2021 Needs Assessment of Grade 8 Instructional Materials in Teaching Filipino: A Phenomenology ResearchGate https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349900422_Needs_Assessment_of_Grade_8_Instructional_Materials_in_Teaching_Filipino_A_Phenomenology EdReports 2023 Annual Report 2023 https://cdn.edreports.org/media/2024/04/2023-edreports-annual-report.pdf EdReports 2024 Reflections on 2024 and Looking to the Future of EdReports EdReports.org https://edreports.org/resources/article/reflections-2024-future-of-edreports Education Elements A Comprehensive Guide to High-Quality Instructional Materials (HQIM) Education Elements https://www.edelements.com/comprehensive-hqim-curriculum-guide FosterS. 2023 Facilitating and Assessing Student Engagement in the Classroom Center for Teaching & Learning, University of Colorado Boulder https://www.colorado.edu/center/teaching-learning/2023/01/23/facilitating-and-assessing-student-engagement-classroom FraenkelJ. R. WallenN. E. HyunH. H. 2012 How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 8th ed. McGraw-Hill Education FredricksJ. A. BlumenfeldP. C. ParisA. H. 2004 School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence Review of Educational Research 74 1 59 109 10.3102/00346543074001059 GarciaE. WeissE. 2020 COVID-19 and Student Performance, Equity, and U.S. Education Policy Economic Policy Institute https://www.epi.org/publication/the-consequences-of-the-covid-19-pandemic-for-education-performance-and-equity-in-the-united-states GeletaS. SeyoumY. 2024 Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of Using Instructional Materials: Evidence from Haramaya Town East African Journal of Education Studies 7 2 99 111 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380122303_Teachers'_Perceptions_and_Practices_of_Using_Instructional_Materials_Evidence_from_Haramaya_Town GubatonM. C. T. 2024 Level of Students’ Motivation and Engagement: Basis for an Enhanced Intervention to Promote Students’ Learning Universal Institute of Research and Technology https://uijrt.com/paper/level-students-motivation-engagement PenuelW. R. HensonK. Buck BraceyZ. VickN. RivetA. 2024 Designing standards-aligned instructional materials that connect to students’ interests and community priorities The Social Studies 115 2 62 70 10.1080/00368555.2024.2390547 Polikoff M. S. 2012 Instructional alignment under No Child Left Behind American Journal of Education 118 3 341 368 10.1086/664773 Portana et al. 2020 Effectiveness and acceptability of instructional materials in the enhancement of students’ academic engagement ResearchGate https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348334247_Effectiveness_and_Acceptability_of_Instructional_Materials_in_the_Enhancement_of_Students_Academic_Achievement Rachmad Y. E. 2022 Educational Engagement Theory Lüneburger Heide Buch Internationaler Verlag 10.17605/OSF.IO/KGTCX Rivet Education 2024 Why high-quality instructional materials are essential for teacher and student success: How standards-aligned, culturally responsive, and inclusive materials drive learning in every classroom https://riveteducation.org/why-high-quality-instructional-materials-are-essential-for-teacher-and-student-success-how-standards-aligned-culturally-responsive-and-inclusive-materials-drive-learning-in-every-classroom/ Second Congressional Commission on Education (EDCOM II) 2024 Miseducation: The Failed System of Philippine Education (Year One Report) https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2024/02/EDCOM-II-Year-One-Report-PDF-022924.pdf Statistics How To 2025 Total Population Sampling https://www.statisticshowto.com/total-population-sampling/ Steiner D. 2024 The Unrealized Promise of High-Quality Instructional Materials State Education Standard 24 1 https://www.nasbe.org/the-unrealized-promise-of-high-quality-instructional-materials/ Subramainan L. Mahmoud M. A. 2020 A Systematic Review on Students’ Engagement in Classroom: Indicators, Challenges and Computational Techniques International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 11 1 10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110113 Sweller J. 1988 Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning Cognitive Science 12 2 257 285 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 Tomei L. 2009 Instructional Materials: Definition and Examples Lexicon of Education Terms IGI Global 10.4018/978-1-5225-8109-3 UNESCO Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization 2023 Technology in Education: A Tool on Whose Terms? Global Education Monitoring Report https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/2023-southeast-asia University of Massachusetts Amherst 2025 Develop Engaging Instructional Materials IDEAS: Instructional Design, Engagement, and Support https://www.umass.edu/ideas/develop-engaging-instructional-materials Urias L. R. 2022 Addressing the Problem of Student Engagement in the Classroom Grand Valley State University https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/gradprojects/225 Van GeelM. KeuningT. MeutstegeK. de VriesJ. 2023 Adapting Teaching to Students’ Needs: What Does It Require from Teachers? Educational Review https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371935336_Adapting_Teaching_to_Students_Needs_What_Does_It_Require_from_Teachers WadmareP. NandaM. SabatesR. SunderN. WadhwaW. 2022 Understanding the Accuracy of Teachers’ Perceptions About Low-Achieving Learners in Primary Schools in Rural India: An Empirical Analysis of Alignments and Misalignments International Journal of Educational Research Open 3 100198 10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100198 WangE. L. Prado TumaA. DoanS. HenryD. LawrenceR. A. WooA. KaufmanJ. H. 2021 Teachers’ Perceptions of What Makes Instructional Materials Engaging, Appropriately Challenging, and Usable: A Survey and Interview Study RAND Corporation https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA134-2.html WangQ. LiuJ. SunL. 2022 Student Perception and Engagement: Exploring Classroom Material Relevance International Journal of Educational Research 112 101940 10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101940