Evaluation of the Equalization of Administrative Positions to Functional Positions within the Tuban Regency Government

Apsari Khusna; V. Rudy Handoko; Achluddin Ibnu Rochim

doi:10.55927/eajmr.v5i7.219

Authors

Apsari Khusna Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
V. Rudy Handoko Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Achluddin Ibnu Rochim Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v5i7.219

Keywords:

Policy Evaluation, Position Equalization, Agile Governance, Bureaucratic Performance, Bureaucratic Reform

Abstract

This study evaluates the implementation and impact of equalizing administrative positions to functional positions (PermenPANRB No. 17/2021) within the Tuban Regency Government. Employing a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach, it integrates William N. Dunn’s evaluation framework, Agile Governance, and Performance Theory. The findings indicate that while the policy succeeded at the macro-administrative level by delayering hierarchies and streamlining budgets, it generated severe micro-operational issues. Efficiency was hampered by high adaptation costs, and a significant competence mismatch affected 26.50% of civil servants. Internal equity collapsed as equalized officials shouldered a double burden of functional and administrative tasks without adequate career paths. Furthermore, internal responsiveness was critically low due to culture shock, latent resistance, and career stagnation anxieties. The policy also proved inappropriate for general administrative support units. Collectively, these issues triggered post-power syndrome and role ambiguity, hindering organizational agility. To mitigate these disruptive impacts, the study recommends immediate competence calibration, precise demarcation of functional and administrative duties, and the expansion of career pathways through structured talent management at the local level.

References

Anderson, J. E. (2014). Public Policymaking: An Introduction (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Ariza, R. (2021). Strategi Penguatan Organisasi Melalui Jabatan Fungsional dalam Perspektif Agile Governance di Kepulauan Riau. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Sektor Publik, 12(1), 15-28.

Arizal, M. I., Handoko, V. R., & Rochim, A. I. (2025). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Dan Kompetensi Pegawai Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Melalui Kepuasan Pegawai di Lingkungan Bagian Protokol. EKONOMIKA45: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi Bisnis, Kewirausahaan, 12(2), 1318–1329.

Birkland, T. A. (2015). An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making (4th ed.). Routledge.

Brewer, B., & Hu, X. (2021). Evaluating civil service reforms using Dunn's framework: Effectiveness and equity in local government. Journal of Public Policy, 41(4), 780-802. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X2000015X

Chen, J., & Bozeman, B. (2023). Measuring the performance of functional vs administrative roles in the state bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac012

Christensen, T., Paarlberg, L., & Perry, J. L. (2017). Public Service Motivation Research and Practice: Assessing the Impact of Equalization on Civil Servants. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 421-434.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization Theory and Design (10th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.

Dye, T. R. (2013). Understanding Public Policy (14th ed.). Pearson.

Dunn, W. N. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik (Edisi Kedua). Gadjah Mada University Press.

Firmansyah, A. (2022). Analisis Keadilan Organisasional (Organizational Justice) dalam Kebijakan Penyetaraan Jabatan di Badan Kepegawaian Negara. Jurnal Manajemen SDM Aparatur, 10(2), 115-130.

Hutasoit, M., & Amalia, S. (2024). Evaluasi Penyetaraan Jabatan Fungsional dan Tantangan Profesionalisme Aparatur Daerah. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik Indonesia, 15(1), 45-59.

Janssen, M., & Van der Voort, H. (2020). Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102180.

Lapsley, I., & Skærbæk, P. (2016). New Public Management and the downsizing of middle management: A critical review. Financial Accountability & Management, 32(1), 4-24.

Leavitt, H. J. (1965). Applied Organizational Change in Industry: Structural, Technological and Humanistic Approaches. Handbook of Organizations, 11(4), 1144-1170.

Lestari, D. A. (2023). Kesiapan Psikologis dan Adaptasi ASN Terhadap Transformasi Jabatan Struktural ke Fungsional di Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 21(2), 200-215.

Luna, A. J. H. O., Kruchten, P., & Moura, H. P. (2015). Agile Governance Theory: conceptual development. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management, 32-45.

Mangkunegara, A. P. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mergel, I. (2018). Agile innovation management in government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 516-523.

Meyer-Sahling, J., & Mikkelsen, K. S. (2022). The effects of flattening hierarchies on service delivery in local government. Local Government Studies, 48(5), 890-911. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1928065

Moeheriono. (2012). Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Osborne, S. P. (2017). Public sector innovation through structural decentralization and delayering. Public Management Review, 19(4), 413-428.

Pratama, R. (2020). Analisis Kebijakan Penyetaraan Jabatan Fungsional dalam Rangka Reformasi Birokrasi di Kementerian Dalam Negeri. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 21-34.

Putra, A., & Keban, Y. T. (2022). Dampak Delayering dan Fungsionalisasi Birokrasi Terhadap Motivasi Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 28(2), 112-129.

Rachmatika, A., Handoko, V. R., & Wahyudi, E. (2024). Pengaruh Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Di Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Bina Marga Provinsi Jawa Timur. Praja Observer: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 4(1), 22-35.

Rahman, F., Arenawati, & Cadith, J. (2024). Problematika Peran Ganda Sub-Koordinator Jabatan Fungsional Hasil Penyetaraan di Pemerintah Kabupaten. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik Daerah, 8(2), 98-114.

Ratnasari, & Handoko, V. R. (2024). Pengembangan Kompetensi Jabatan Fungsional Analis Kebijakan Hasil Penyetaraan Di BPSDM Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Kajian Pemerintah: Journal of Government, Social and Politics, 10(2), 125-140.

Sedarmayanti. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. PT Refika Aditama.

Suartini, S. (2023). Dilema Fungsionalisasi Massal: Antara Reformasi Organisasi dan Kompetensi Pegawai di Indonesia. Jurnal Reformasi Birokrasi, 11(3), 174-190.

Sunarsih, S., Handoko, V. R., & Novaria, R. (2026). Implementation of Supervisory Leadership Training Policy At The East Java Provincial BPSDM In Driving Organizational Performance Change. Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science, 6(2), 304-328.

Suryani, I. (2020). Tantangan Manajemen Karir Aparatur Sipil Negara Pasca Kebijakan Penghapusan Eselon III dan IV. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan, 4(2), 110-124.

Sutanto, H., & Triputro, D. (2024). Analisis Stagnasi Karier dan Dampak Psikologis Pegawai Pasca Penyetaraan Jabatan Struktural di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Psikologi Birokrasi, 6(1), 80-95.

Syafaatun, A., Sukristyanto, A., & Indartuti, E. (2025). Implementasi Kebijakan Melalui Sistem Informasi Kepegawaian (SIKEP) Mahkamah Agung RI Fitur Presensi Online Bagi Hakim dan Aparatur. Jurnal Mude, 6272, 12-24.

Wahyudi, I., Sujoko, T., & Wening, S. (2024). Transformasi Budaya Kerja dan Dampak Birokrasi Flat Terhadap Kinerja Instansi Sektoral Daerah. Jurnal Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Daerah, 16(2), 110-125.

Wijaya, H. (2023). Post-Power Syndrome dan Resistensi Pasif Mantan Pejabat Eselon IV Pasca Penyetaraan Jabatan. Jurnal Psikologi Birokrasi, 5(2), 110-125.