Community-Driven Development (CDD) in the Governance of the Urban Village Fund in Benowo Urban Village, Surabaya City

Aditya Aditya; Rudy Handoko; Bambang Kusbandrijo

doi:10.55927/eajmr.v5i7.218

Authors

Aditya Aditya Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Rudy Handoko Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Bambang Kusbandrijo Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v5i7.218

Keywords:

Community-Driven Development, Urban Village Fund, Public Governance, Type IV Self-Management.

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of the Community-Driven Development (CDD) approach in the governance of the Urban Village Fund (Dana Kelurahan) in Benowo Urban Village, Surabaya City, and identifies its supporting and inhibiting factors. The study employs a qualitative descriptive method with data collection through observation, documentation, and interviews with key informants. The results indicate that the CDD-based governance is highly successful, achieving a 100% physical absorption rate through Type IV Self-Management (Swakelola Tipe IV). The five CDD principles from Kilby (2011) are comprehensively implemented: (1) A focus on the community is realized through the inclusive absorption of aspirations; (2) Participatory planning runs democratically and is secured by the e-Musbangkel system; (3) Control over resources is delegated autonomously to Community Groups (Pokmas), supported by cashless transaction innovations; (4) Community involvement in implementation has a massive impact on labor-intensive economic empowerment; (5) Community-based monitoring utilizes a hybrid system involving residents, the Community Empowerment Institution (LPMK), and urban village technicians. The primary supporting factors are the alignment of programs with aspirations, dedicated bureaucratic mentoring, the regulatory umbrella, high social capital, and the digital literacy of the youth. The inhibiting factors include the pragmatism of commuter residents, the generation gap, and the complexity of reporting administration. In conclusion, governance in Benowo Urban Village has successfully fostered citizen independence, although the digitalization of reporting administration is urgently needed.

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571.

Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of governance and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 185-205.

Bastian, I. (2018). Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Bovens, M. (2007). Analyzing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468.

Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton University Press.

Checkoway, B. (2011). What is youth participation?. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(2), 340-345.

Dongier, P., Van Domelen, J., Ostrom, E., Rizvi, A., Wakeman, W., Bebbington, A., ... & Alkire, S. (2003). Community Driven Development. Dalam Poverty Reduction Strategy Sourcebook (hal. 303-327). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Drucker, P. F. (2005). Managing the Non-Profit Organization. HarperBusiness.

Dunn, W. N. (2014). Public Policy Analysis. Pearson.

Dwiyanto, A. (2005). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Faguet, J. P., & Pöschl, C. (2015). Is Decentralization Good for Development? Perspectives from Academics and Policy Makers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7-20.

Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Verso.

Habermas, J. (2018). The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press.

Halim, A. (2014). Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Harrison, T. M., Pardo, T. A., & Cook, M. (2012). Creating open government ecosystems: A research and development agenda. Future Internet, 4(4), 900-928.

Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. Verso Books.

Kilby, P. (2011). Empowerment and Community Driven Development. Canberra: ANU Press.

Klitgaard, R. (2011). Controlling Corruption. University of California Press.

Kurniawan, D., et al. (2021). Penerapan kebijakan standarisasi pengadaan publik. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 15(2), 110-125.

Lupton, D. (2014). Digital Sociology. Routledge.

Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Localizing Development: Does Participation Work?. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10-29.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Edition 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641-672.

Platteau, J. P. (2014). Elite capture in participating development. Development and Change, 45(4), 785-801.

Ribot, J. C. (2011). Democratic decentralization of natural resources: Institutionalizing popular participation. World Resources Institute.

Sanoff, H. (2000). Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning. John Wiley & Sons.

Scott, J. C. (2008). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Yale University Press.

Sedarmayanti. (2009). Reformasi Administrasi Publik, Reformasi Birokrasi, dan Kepemimpinan Masa Depan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Subbarao, K. (2013). Public Works as a Safety Net: Design, Evidence, and Implementation. World Bank Publications.

Syafiie, I. K. (2006). Ilmu Administrasi Publik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Tjokroamidjojo, B. (2011). Good Governance: Paradigma Baru Manajemen Pembangunan. Jakarta: UI Press.

Turner, J. F. C. (1976). Housing by People: Towards Autonomy in Building Environments. Marion Boyars.

Weber, M. (2015). Bureaucracy. Dalam Economy and Society (hal. 956-1005). University of California Press.

Wong, S. (2012). Elite Capture or Community Control? The Politics of Community-Driven Development in Southeast Asia. Journal of Development Studies, 48(9), 1251-1268.

Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2020). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225-249.