Organizations, Agents, and Networks Analysis for Understanding Obstacles in “Indonesia One Data”

Fibriyani Nur Aliya; Fransiskus Trisakti Haryadi; Ahmad Romadhoni Surya Putra

doi:10.55927/eajmr.v5i4.74

Authors

Fibriyani Nur Aliya Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
Fransiskus Trisakti Haryadi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta
Ahmad Romadhoni Surya Putra Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v5i4.74

Keywords:

Network analysis, Organizational communication, Agents drives, Collaboration, Collaborative

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the communication network structure among agents in the implementation of Satu Data Indonesia (SDI) and identify the strategic roles of agents that influence policy performance amid sectoral ego barriers. This study employs a network analysis approach to map communication and coordination relations between SDI agents. The theoretical framework under consideration integrates collaborative governance, organizational communication, and the Common KADS Communication Model. The results indicate three key agents. High Closeness agent values exhibit accelerated and extensive communication access. High betweenness agent values function as pivotal connectors between agencies and occupy strategic positions in the management of network fragmentation caused by sectoral ego. High authority agent exhibit robust legitimacy and structural influence in directing SDI network interactions and coordination. These findings provide empirical and practical contributions in formulating strategies to strengthen collaboration and improve the performance of Satu Data Indonesia

References

Adinegoro, B., Fuad, M., Ruhuputy, A., Pambudi, I., & Arrahman, T. (2025). Kebijakan Satu Data Indonesia: Sebuah Antitesis Semangat Keterbukaan dan Informasi Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 16(1).

Aljunid, S. M., Srithamrongsawat, S., Chen, W., Bae, S. J., Pwu, R. F., Ikeda, S., & Xu, L. (2012). Health-care data collecting, sharing, and using in Thailand, China Mainland, South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, and Malaysia. Value in Health, 15(1 SUPPL.). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.004

Anindya, C. R. (2019). The deradicalisation programme for Indonesian deportees: A vacuum in coordination. Journal for Deradicalization, (18), 217–243. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85081354487&partnerID=40&md5=21dd2c1fba3b58a41a140c3309f977f6

Bernot, A., Tjondronegoro, D., Rifai, B., Hasan, R., Liew, A. W. C., Verhelst, T., & Tiwari, M. (2024). Institutional Dimensions in Open Government Data: A Deep Dive Into Indonesia’s Satu Data Initiative and Its Implications for Developing Countries. Public Performance and Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2377609

Bisht, S., Kumar, A., Goyal, N., Ram, M., & Klochkov, Y. (2021). Analysis of network reliability characteristics and importance of components in a communication network. Mathematics, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9121347

Bisri, M. H., Muluk, M. R. K., & Wijaya, A. F. (2024). COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE MODEL OF IPSPS (INDEPENDENT PUBLIC SERVICES PROVIDERS) OF JOINT VILLAGE-OWNED ENTERPRISES (BUMDESMA) IN INDONESIA. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n5-133

Boella, G., & Van Der Torre, L. (2005). Organizations as socially constructed agents in the agent oriented paradigm. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3451 LNAI, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/11423355_1

Cahyaningsih, E., Silalahi, N. L. E., Rohajawati, S., & Avianti, Y. M. (2022). COMMONKADS for Knowledge Based System Development: A Literature Study. 2022 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation, ICITSI 2022 - Proceedings, 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITSI56531.2022.9970920

Calò, F., Teasdale, S., Roy, M. J., Bellazzecca, E., & Mazzei, M. (2024). Exploring Collaborative Governance Processes Involving Nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53(1), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231155817

Chivu, L. (2019). Local entrepreneurship and social services in Romania. Territorial analysis. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.04.001

Cho, B., Noh, I. H., Roggio, A. M., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2025). Exploring the impact of collaboration processes on policy networks success: a case study of food policy councils. Public Management Review, 27(1), 241–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2241047

Davies, A. L., & White, R. M. (2012). Collaboration in natural resource governance: Reconciling stakeholder expectations in deer management in Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management, 112, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.032

El Said, G. R. (2015). Understanding Knowledge Management System antecedents of performance impact: Extending the Task-technology Fit Model with intention to share knowledge construct. Future Business Journal, 1(1–2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2015.11.003

Eliwa, H. K., Jelodar, M. B., Poshdar, M., & Zavvari, A. (2024). Organizational Infrastructure and Information and Communication Technology Infrastructure Alignment in Construction Organizations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(7). https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13808

Feng, P., Lu, X., Gong, Z., & Sun, D. (2021). Social network analysis model for research on organizational structure of the pyramid scheme communication network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125548

Firmansyah, A. D., & Susanto, T. D. (2023). The unsuccessful of Satu Data Indonesia (SDI) implementation: a lesson learned from local government. Jurnal Mantik, 7(1), 2685–4236.

Gan, X., Chang, R., & Wen, T. (2018). Overcoming barriers to off-site construction through engaging stakeholders: A two-mode social network analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.299

Garnett, J. L., Marlowe, J., & Pandey, S. K. (2008). Penetrating the performance predicament: Communication as a mediator or moderator of organizational culture’s impact on public organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00861.x

Hakim, L., & Adiarsa, S. R. (2024). Structuration in implementing Satu Data Indonesia policy in local government. 2023. https://doi.org/10.31603/bishss.105

He, Y., & Tang, P. (2023). Understanding the Role(s) of Social Networks in the Transition from Farmers’ Willingness to Behavior Regarding Withdrawal from Rural Homesteads: A Research Study Based on Typical Regions of Sichuan Province. Land, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/land12081505

Hoog, R. de, Martil, R., Wielinga, B., Taylor, R., Bright, C., & Velde, W. van de. (1998). The Common KADS model set.

Hulst, R., & Van Montfort, A. (2007). The Netherlands: Cooperation as the only viable strategy. In Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe (pp. 139–168). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5379-7_7

Islami, M. J. (2021). Implementasi Satu Data Indonesia: Tantangan dan Critical Success Factors (CSFs) One Data Indonesia Implementation: Challenges and Critical Success Factors. Jurnal Komunika: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Informatika, 10(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.31504/komunika.v9i1.3750

Jordan, R., Fitzsimmons, T. W., & Callan, V. J. (2025). The maverick factor: the role of positively deviant change agents in radical organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 38(8), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2024-0241

Jung, H., & Phoa, F. K. H. (2021). On the effects of capability and popularity on network dynamics with applications to YouTube and Twitch networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125663

Lasagni, G. (2022). On What Makes a Social Group a Group Agent. Philosophical Inquiries, 10(2), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.4454/philinq.v10i2.379

Lawlor, J. A., & McGirr, S. (2017). Agent-based modeling as a tool for program design and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 65, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.08.015

Lenk, T. (2025). Conflicts of Interest and Complexity in the Context of Organizational Communication. In Conflicts of Interest and Complexity in the Context of Organizational Communication. Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-48895-6

Lorkiewicz, W., Katarzyniak, R., & Kowalczyk, R. (2012). Individual semiosis in multi-agent systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7270 LNCS, 167–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32066-8_8

Lu, X., & Jin, Y. (2024). Optimizing organizational corrective communication: The effects of correction placement timing, refutation detail level, and corrective narrative type on combating crisis misinformation narratives. Public Relations Review, 50(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102514

Martitah, M., Arifin, S., Sumarto, S., & Widiyanto, W. (2021). CONFRONTING E-GOVERNMENT ADOPTION IN INDONESIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 6(2), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i2.47795

Maurer, M., Bach, N., & Oertel, S. (2023). Changes in formal structure towards self-managing organization and their effects on the intra-organizational communication network. Journal of Organization Design, 12(3), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00143-z

Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670

Nurdin, I., Sardini, N. H., & Oktaviani, J. (2023). The Origins of Indonesian Democracy and Its Implications in Indonesian Politics. Archives of Business Research, 11(5), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.115.14703

Õim, K. E., & Leis, T. (2025). Exploring Internal Challenges in Internationalisation: A Case of a Software as a Service (SaaS) Internationaliser. European Management Studies, 2024(4), 4–32. https://doi.org/10.7172/2956-7602.106.1

Östberg, L., Snyder, K., & Lilja, J. (2026). Key factors driving the co-creation of collaborative improvement and innovation in rural development ecosystems. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 36(7), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-05-2025-0177

Pangaribuan, A. M. A. (2022). Cooperation and Non-Cooperation in Indonesian Criminal Case Processing:

Pauken, C., Hartmann, M., & Wimmer, M. A. (2023). Open Government Data Strategies in South Korea and Japan: A Comparative Case Analysis. In J. Ubacht, C. Csaki, L. Danneels, N. Edelmann, M. Janssen, E. Kalampokis, I. Lingren, N. A.-S., P. Panagiotopoulos, P. Parycek, G. V Pereira, I. Susha, G. Schwabe, S. Virkar, E. Tambouris, & A. Zuiderwijk (Eds.), CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 3449). CEUR-WS. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85168246208&partnerID=40&md5=3e6a656df5bb9a3c8f8999669ac481d3

Porcu, L., del Barrio-García, S., Kitchen, P. J., & Tourky, M. (2020). The antecedent role of a collaborative vs. a controlling corporate culture on firm-wide integrated marketing communication and brand performance. Journal of Business Research, 119(October), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.049

Raya, A. B., Kriska, M., Fatonah, S., Andiani, R., Seleky, R. N., Witjaksono, R., & Harsoyo, H. (2024). The Popularity of Extension Workers in the Exchange of Information on Yard Utilization. Komunikator, 16(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.21585

Rimlinger, J., Jaumouillé, A., Freissinet, C., Craveiro, J. L., Zózimo, A. C., Oliveira, M. M., Cruz, M. M., Bakogianni, E., Tzempelikos, D., Pavlidi, E., & Sfetsos, A. (2026). Shaping local disaster risk governance through multi-stakeholder collaboration: Insights from the public-private-civil partnership approach - Application to the case studies of the municipality of Egaleo (Greece) and Centro Region (Portugal). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105973

Said Saleh, M., Ismail, O., Kamel, A., & Hassan, H. (2018). From CommonKADS to SOA Environment: An Adaptation Model. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 43(12), 7605–7619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3114-5

Shao, J., Su, L. Y.-F., Gong, Z., & Chen, M. (2025). Conversational Agents and Charitable Behavioral Intentions: The Roles of Modality, Communication Style, and Perceived Anthropomorphism. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 103616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103616

Simões, D., Lau, N., & Paulo Reis, L. (2020). Multi-agent actor centralized-critic with communication. Neurocomputing, 390, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.079

Subahe, A. H., Baker, P., & Polman, R. (2026). Facilitating collaboration between public health researchers and policymakers: a scoping review of global practices, barriers and facilitators. In Health Research Policy and Systems (Vol. 24, Number 1). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-026-01443-y

Surakratanasakul, B. (2017). Lightweight CommonKADS in knowledge intensive organization. 2017 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, ICITEE 2017, 2018-January, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITEED.2017.8250504

Tang, T., Ha, J., Chen, S., Wang, W., Zhang, Z., Zhong, L., & Li, M. (2026). Coupling coordination and obstacles in industrial historical spaces: the environment-value-memory framework in Shenyang. Npj Heritage Science, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-026-02378-x

Tommy, S., Rusli, Z., Sujianto, Herianto, M., & Saputra, T. (2025). COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. Public Policy and Administration, 24(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.13165/VPA-25-24-2-02

Wang, Y., Xiang, P., Ge, Y., Yang, S., Liu, X., & Qian, Y. (2026). Strategies for improving the interconnection performance of regional transport infrastructure. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06480-6

Wen, T., Chen, Y. wang, Syed, T. A., & Ghataoura, D. (2025). Examining communication network behaviors, structure and dynamics in an organizational hierarchy: A social network analysis approach. Information Processing and Management, 62(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103927

Zhou, Y., Chen, G., Pu, C., Wu, K., & Chen, Z. (2025). Distributed policy evaluation over multi-agent network with communication delays. Neurocomputing, 648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130562

Zorlu, K., & Korkmaz, F. (2021). Organizational Communication as an Effective Communication Strategy in Organizations and the Role of the Leader. In H. Dincer & S. Yüksel (Eds.), Management Strategies to Survive in a Competitive Environment How to Improve Company Performance (pp. 305–320). Springer.