Jumathji: Its Acceptability as an Interactive Learning Material for Enhancing Skills in Solving Linear Equation

John Lemer Bravo; Ruenna Jane Galvez; Saira Navarro; Michelle Colegio; Archeleigh Jatulan

doi:10.55927/eajmr.v5i5.162

Authors

John Lemer Bravo Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Ruenna Jane Galvez Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Saira Navarro Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Michelle Colegio Polytechnic University of the Philippines
Archeleigh Jatulan Polytechnic University of the Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v5i5.162

Keywords:

Learning Material, Linear Equations, Usefulness, Subject matter, and Appeal to the target user

Abstract

The study evaluated the acceptability of JUMATHJI as a tool for enhancing students’ skills in solving linear equations. Mathematics teachers from public schools in Quezon City reviewed the material and assessed its usefulness, subject matter, quality, and appeal to the target user. The board game was rated highly across all indicators, with teachers noting its relevance and ability to motivate students to engage with the subject matter. Findings showed that JUMATHJI supports the development of critical and logical thinking—skills essential in mathematics—and helps build students’ confidence and positive attitudes toward the subject. The researchers recommend integrating JUMATHJI into instruction to enhance students’ problem-solving abilities and encourage active engagement in learning linear equations.

References

Bragg, L. (2007). Students’ Conflicting Attitudes Towards Games as a Vehicle for Learning Mathematics: A Methodological Dilemma. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 29-44.

Chung, C., Yen-Chih, H., Yeh, R., & Lou, S. (2017). The Influence of Board Games on Mathematical Spatial Ability of Grade 9 Students in Junior High School. People Int. J. Soc. Sci, 3, 120-143.

Dharwad. (2013). Mathematics Plays Vital Role in Technological Development. The Hindu.

Dio, R. V. (2015). Game Development as Students’ Engagement Project in High School Mathematics. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(5), 110-119.

Ethridge, D. (2004). Research Methodology in Applied Economics. In S. John Wiley.

Fox, W., & Bayat, M. S. (2007). A Guide to Managing Research. Juta & Organization Ltd. on Sequences. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 8.

Frossard, F., Barajas, M., & Trifonova, A. (2012). A Learner-Centred Game-Design Approach: Impacts on Teachers’ Creativity. Digital Education Review, 2012, 21, p. 13-22.

Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model. Simulation & gaming, 33(4), 441-467.

Greenhalgh, S. P., Koehler, M. J., & Boltz, L. O. (2019). The Fun of its Parts: Design and Player Reception of Educational Board Games. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 19(3), 469-497.

Hamzina, A. (2013). Mathematics is the Queen of Science. Available at: enu.kz/repository/repository2012/mathematics.pdf.

Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of research on technology in education, 41(4), 393-416.

Harry, C. (2009). Meet the New School Board: Board games are back- and they're exactly what your curriculum needs. School Library Journal, 55, 24-26.

Jimenez-Silva, M., White-Taylor, J. D., & Gomez, C. (2010). Opening Opportunities through Math Board Games: Collaboration between Schools and a Teacher Education Program. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 2.

Martin, A., & Marsh, H. (2005). Motivating Boys and Motivating Girls: Does Teacher Gender Really Make a Difference?. Australian Journal of Education, 49(3), 320-334.

Oselumese, I. B., Blessing, O. K. O. G. B. O., & Vinnela, O. K. O. N. T. A. (2016). Marital Status and Teachers’ Job Performance in Public Secondary Schools in Edo State. IJournals: International Journal of Social Relevance & Concern, 4(9), 33-38.

Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster.

Sánchez-Mena, A., Martí-Parreño, J., & Aldás-Manzano, J. (2017). The Effect of Age on Teachers' Intention to Use Educational Video Games: A TAM Approach. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(4), 355-366.

Sherman, H. J., Richardson, L. I., & Yard G. J. (2009). Why do Students Struggle with Mathematics? Pearson Education Inc.

Treher, E. N. (2011). Learning with Board Games. The Learning Key Inc.

Woodhams, J. J. (2006). Using Manipulative and Games to Improve Proficiency in Mathematics. Mathematical and Computing Sciences, 46.

Zhang, D. (2008). The Effect of Teacher Education Level, Teaching Experience, and Teaching Behaviors on Student Science Achievement. Utah State University.